As you may have heard, the city of New York will be introducing a ban on the use of trans-fats at all restaurants.
NEW YORK (AP) -- New York on Tuesday became the first city in the nation to ban artery-clogging artificial trans fats at restaurants, leading the charge to limit consumption of an ingredient linked to heart disease and used in everything from french fries to pizza dough to pancake mix.
In a city where eating out is a major form of activity -- either for fun or out of hectic necessity -- many New Yorkers were all for the ban, saying that health concerns were more important than fears of Big Brother supervising their stomachs.
"I don't care about what might be politically correct and what's not," said Murray Bader, nursing a cup of coffee at Dunkin' Donuts on Tuesday morning. "I want to live longer!"
While this may provide some health benefits to many New Yorkers who are oblivious of what they are eating, this also begs the question, "Do we really need the government telling us what we can and can't eat?"
Perhaps the market can dictate if this makes sense: restaurants could encourage consumers to frequent their establishment by letting customers know they do not use trans fats, does Big Brother need to force all restaurants to do so?
What about the mom and pop shops that make smaller margins? Using trans-fat free oils may increase their costs and put them at a greater disadvantage to larger establishments. Besides the economic argument, there is also the argument that it is not the job of the government to dictate what ingredients restauranteurs can and cannot use, assuming these ingredients do not directly harm patrons. We as consumers have a responsibility for our own health; we do, of course, expect that restaurants are not poisoning us. We do also have a choice -- we can choose to visit the restaurants that are health conscious versus the grease barrel down the road.
Americans cannot depend on the government to be told how to be healthy; it should be an individual lifestyle choice and individuals should have to take responsibility of their individual choices. Admittedly, if I have a choice, I'd rather eat at a restaurant serving food without transfats, but I like having the choice. I don't see why the government needs to decide for us.